A comprehensive guide from AHIMA on maintaining integrity in healthcare documentation through proper querying techniques — ensuring accurate code assignment and compliant clinical communication.
A query is a communication tool used to clarify documentation in the health record for accurate code assignment. The desired outcome is an update to the health record that better reflects a practitioner's intent and clinical thought processes.
The final coded diagnoses and procedures derived from health record documentation should accurately reflect the patient's episode of care. This practice brief augments and, where applicable, supersedes prior AHIMA guidance on queries.
All professionals are encouraged to adhere to these compliant querying guidelines regardless of credential, role, title, or technological tools used.
In court, an attorney can't "lead" a witness. In hospitals, coders and clinical documentation specialists can't lead healthcare providers with queries. Appropriate etiquette must be followed when querying providers for additional health record information.
A proper query process ensures that appropriate documentation appears in the health record. Personnel performing the query function should focus on a compliant process and content reflective of appropriate clinical indicators.
A query should be considered when the health record documentation meets any of the following conditions:
Documentation is conflicting, imprecise, incomplete, illegible, ambiguous, or inconsistent.
Describes clinical indicators without a definitive relationship to an underlying diagnosis.
Includes clinical indicators, diagnostic evaluation, and/or treatment not related to a specific condition or procedure.
Provides a diagnosis without underlying clinical validation, or is unclear for present on admission (POA) indicator assignment.
Preferred format. Allows the provider to respond freely based on clinical judgment without being directed to a specific answer.
Acceptable under certain circumstances. Must include clinically significant options plus "clinically undetermined" and "other" for free text.
Acceptable in limited circumstances. Must also include "other," "clinically undetermined," and "not clinically significant" options.

A leading query is one that is not supported by the clinical elements in the health record and/or directs a provider to a specific diagnosis or procedure. The justification — inclusion of relevant clinical indicators — is more important than the query format.
Obtunded patient admitted with three-day history of nausea and vomiting. CXR revealed right lower lobe (RLL) pneumonia. Clindamycin ordered.
"Is the patient's pneumonia due to aspiration?"
"Can the etiology of the patient's pneumonia be further specified? This obtunded patient had a history of nausea and vomiting prior to admission and is treated with clindamycin for RLL pneumonia. Based on the above, can the etiology be further specified? If so, please document the type/etiology in the progress notes."
All queries must be accompanied by the relevant clinical indicator(s) that show why a more complete or accurate diagnosis or procedure is requested. Clinical indicators should be derived from the specific medical record under review and the unique episode of care.
Although AHA's Coding Clinic for ICD-9-CM often references clinical indicators, it is not an authoritative source for establishing them. Clinical indicators supporting the query may include diagnostic findings, provider impressions, and other elements from the entire medical record.
Best practice is to capture the content of both verbal and written queries, as well as any practitioner response, to account for documentation that might otherwise appear out of context.
If the practitioner documents a query response directly into the health record without supporting clinical information, they should provide clinical rationale (e.g., "Patient transfused four days ago due to acute blood loss anemia").
If the practitioner responds only on the query form, that form should become part of the permanent health record. Organizations not maintaining queries in the permanent record should keep copies as administrative business records.
Multiple choice query formats must include clinically significant and reasonable options as supported by clinical indicators in the health record. There may be only one reasonable option in some cases.
Providing a new diagnosis as an option — when supported by referenced clinical indicators — is not introducing new information.
Always include "clinically undetermined" and "other" to allow the provider to add free text.
"Not clinically significant" and "integral to" may be included on the query form if appropriate.
Substantiating or further specifying a diagnosis already present in the health record (e.g., findings in pathology, radiology, and other diagnostic reports) with physician interpretation.
Establishing a cause-and-effect relationship between documented conditions such as manifestation/etiology, complications (e.g., hypertension and congestive heart failure).
Resolving conflicting documentation from multiple practitioners. Also used for present on admission (POA) determinations.
In the impression of the pathology report, ovarian cancer is documented; however, only "ovarian mass" is documented in the final discharge statement by the provider.
This yes/no query involves confirming a diagnosis already present as an interpretation of a pathology specimen in the health record.
"Do you agree with the pathology report specifying the 'ovarian mass' as an 'ovarian cancer'? Please document your response in the health record or below."
Yes _____ No _____ Other _____ Clinically Undetermined _____
Name: _____ Date: _____
Consulting pulmonologist documents pneumonia as an impression based on the chest X-ray. However, the attending physician documents bronchitis throughout the record, including in the discharge summary.
This is an example of a yes/no query resolving conflicting practitioner documentation.
"Do you agree with the pulmonologist's impression that the patient has pneumonia? Please document your response in the health record or below."
Yes _____ No _____ Other _____ Clinically Undetermined _____
Name: _____ Date: _____
Verbal queries should contain the same clinical indicators and follow the same format as written queries to ensure compliance and consistency in policy and process. Documentation may be condensed but must identify the clinical indicators and the actual question posed.
Verbal queries should be documented at the time of the discussion or immediately following. A standard format should be used:
"Spoke with Dr. X regarding the documentation of _(condition/procedure)_ based upon the clinical indicator(s) found in the health record _(list what was found and where)_."
The focus of external audits has expanded to include clinical validation review. CMS has instructed coders to "refer to the Coding Clinic guidelines and query the physician when clinical validation is required."
When a practitioner documents a diagnosis not supported by clinical indicators, a query should be generated to address the conflict, or the conflict addressed through the facility's escalation policy.
CMS recommends each facility develop an escalation policy for unanswered queries. This may include referral to a physician advisor, chief medical officer, or other administrative personnel.
Laboratory finding of serum sodium of 120 mmol/L and the attending physician documents hypernatremia in the final diagnostic statement.
"Please review the laboratory section of the present record to confirm your discharge diagnosis of hypernatremia. Laboratory findings indicate a serum sodium of 120 mmol/L."
Four-year-old child sustains a cautery injury to upper lip during maxillofacial surgery. Silvadene and dressing applied; plastic surgery consulted. Surgeon documented "no intraoperative complications."
"Please review the operative note notation of 'a cautery lesion to the upper lip,' subsequent treatment with Silvadene and clarify your documentation of 'no intraoperative complications.'"
Each organization should develop internal policies regarding query retention. Ideally, a practitioner's response is documented in the health record — including progress notes or discharge summary. If the record has been completed, an addendum should be timely, bear the current date, time, and reason, and be electronically signed.
Organizational policies must address query retention consistent with statutory or regulatory guidelines, specifying whether the query is part of the permanent health record or a separate business record.
It may be necessary to retain the query indefinitely if it contains information not documented in the health record. Auditors may request copies to validate query wording.
An important consideration in query retention is the ability to collect data for trend analysis, providing opportunity for process improvement and identification of educational needs.
A patient is admitted with pneumonia. The admitting H&P reveals WBC of 14,000; respiratory rate of 24; temperature of 102°F; heart rate of 120; hypotension; and altered mental status. IV antibiotic and IV fluid resuscitation administered.
"The patient has elevated WBCs, tachycardia, and is given an IV antibiotic for Pseudomonas cultured from the blood. Are you treating for sepsis?"
"Based on your clinical judgment, can you provide a diagnosis representing: WBC 14,000; respiratory rate 24; temperature 102°F; heart rate 120; hypotension; altered mental status; IV antibiotic; IV fluid resuscitation? Please document the condition and causative organism (if known) in the medical record."
A patient is admitted for a right hip fracture. H&P notes chronic congestive heart failure. Recent echocardiogram showed left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) of 25 percent. Home medications include metoprolol XL, lisinopril, and Lasix.
"Please document if you agree the patient has chronic diastolic heart failure."
"Given chronic congestive heart failure and EF of 25%, can the chronic heart failure be further specified as: Chronic systolic heart failure / Chronic diastolic heart failure / Chronic systolic and diastolic heart failure / Some other type / Undetermined?"
Patient admitted with cellulitis around a recent operative wound. Query: "Is the cellulitis due to or the result of the surgical procedure?" — This involves a documented condition potentially resulting from a procedure.
Congestive heart failure documented; echocardiogram shows systolic dysfunction; patient on lisinopril, Lasix, Lanoxin. Query asks if CHF can be further specified as systolic — determining specificity of a documented condition.
Serosal injury to stomach noted and repaired during abdominal mass removal. Query asks if this was a complication, integral to the procedure, or not clinically significant — determining clinical significance of a procedural finding.
Bilateral lower extremity edema noted on admission with no other clinical indicators for malnutrition. A yes/no query asking if edema is "diagnostic of malnutrition" is non-compliant. An open-ended or multiple choice query should be used instead.
Patient with GI bleed, hemoglobin drop from 12 to 7.5 g/dL, two units transfused. A yes/no query asking if "anemia" can be specified as "acute blood loss anemia" is non-compliant — a multiple choice or open-ended query is required.
A query that explains the impact of a diagnosis on physician and hospital profiles is inappropriate. It questions clinical judgment and may be more appropriate as part of an escalation policy and/or physician education.
Healthcare professionals working alongside practitioners to ensure accuracy in health record documentation should follow established facility policies congruent with recognized professional guidelines. This practice brief represents the joint efforts of AHIMA and the Association for Clinical Documentation Improvement Specialists.
As healthcare delivery continues to evolve, future revisions to these guidelines are expected. The term "possible" is a very broad qualifier and its use in a query is discouraged.
Thank you for your interest in our Medical Coding Training Programs. Please fill out our enquiry form with accurate details. Our HR team will contact you shortly with course information, batch schedules, fees, demo class details, and career guidance.
Download on the Apple App Store:
https://apps.apple.com/us/app/jvages/id6760653388
Download on Google Play:
Google Play Store
Access our learning portal online:
https://learn.jvageshealthcare.com/
📞 +91 80150 29971
📞 +91 90635 46650
📞 +91 93903 79206
📞 +91 80744 68321
📞 +91 90434 64563
📞 +91 86680 66650
Stay updated with FREE Demo Classes, Workshop Announcements, New Batch Schedules, Job Alerts, and Training Updates.
Join the Group
Get instant updates on Fresher Medical Coding Jobs, Experienced Medical Coding Openings, and Industry Updates & Career Opportunities.
Follow the Channel
AGES Coding TECH
4th Floor, Shreyas Anish PVR North West Apartment,
F-402A, Balaji Nagar, Kukatpally,
Hyderabad, Telangana – 500072
AHA. Coding Clinic, Second Quarter, 2012, p. 21.
AHIMA. "Amendments in the Electronic Health Record." AHIMA Toolkit. Published August 15, 2012.
AHIMA. "Guidance for Clinical Documentation Improvement Programs." Journal of AHIMA 81, no.5 (May 2010): 45–50.
AHIMA. "Managing an Effective Query Process." Journal of AHIMA 79, no.10 (October 2008): 83–88.
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. "Medicare Quarterly Provider Compliance Newsletter." Volume 1, Issue 4. July 2011.
We look forward to helping you achieve your goals. Fill out the form below and our team will get in touch with you soon with course information, batch schedules, fees, demo class details, and career guidance.
Guidelines for Achieving a Compliant Query Practice